Reasoning and its role in achieving the principle of transparency in the administrative decision

Authors

  • Zainab Majid Muhammad Ali University of Kufa - College of Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2023/v1.i57.11738

Keywords:

administrative corruption, administrative transparency, administrative decision, reasoning, reason, administrative judiciary

Abstract

In order to reach tangible results in the framework of administrative work, the policy for conducting administrative work must be clear, clear and transparent. Achieving the principle of transparency in undertaking administrative work has multiple benefits that cannot be counted, because development programs, the embodiment of democratic governance and the protection of human rights are objectives that can only be achieved by the existence of a general principle of transparency that governs the management of the state’s business in general and the administration’s work and activities in particular, and this can only be achieved in accordance with For certain legal mechanisms through which the real application of this principle is achieved, and reasoning is one of the most important legal mechanisms for applying the principle of transparency in administrative decisions It plays an effective role in increasing the effectiveness of oversight to verify the validity of management decisions on the one hand, and a reason for increasing the management’s interest in studying its decisions on the other hand, and then avoiding any mistakes A legal wrongfulness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Richard DEAU , Les actes administratifs unilatéraux négociés , THÈSE DE DOCTORAT, UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERSUFR Droit, Economie, Gestion , 2006 .

F.P.Benoit, Le Droit administratif français, Dalloz, 1968.

G.Vedel,P.Dévolvé,Droi administratif,tome1,12 édition,PUF,1993.

ثانياً: الاحكام القضائية الفرنسية

C.E, 03 novembre 2003, M.Lhoumeau c/ Le gouvernement de la Polynésie française, AJDA,2003, consulté.

C.E, 17 novembre1982, Kairenga,req.n° 35065 , consulté.

C.E.,11 Oct.1999 conclusion Du commissaire de government ( cour adm. Appel Bordeaux), les petites affiches n. 261du 31 decembre 1999.

http://www.arabacademy.gov.sy/uploads/lectures2018/mohannadnouh2009.pdf

https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/315/9/2/44287.

L.211_5 Code des relation entre le public et l´administration publié sous l´ordonnance n˚2015-1341 du 23 octobre 2015 relative aux dispositions législatives du code des relation entre le public.

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Ali, Zainab. “Reasoning and Its Role in Achieving the Principle of Transparency in the Administrative Decision”. Kufa Journal of Arts, vol. 1, no. 57, Sept. 2023, pp. 281-16, doi:10.36317/kaj/2023/v1.i57.11738.

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.