The fundamentalists’ argument based on the conduct of rational people: presentation and discussion

Abstract

There are some differences the  in the evidence between the common conduct of thinking mankind members and the conduct of Sharia legislators، and one of it is the act of infallible Imam or not، because the conduct of thinking mankind members needs the legal proof،but the behavior of legislators does not need to this proof.

Obviously the common tradition is not absolute evidence and there is no way to depend on the most certain amount of it.

Scholars of Jurisprudence origins took the common tradition as an evidence in the many researches like the researches of evidences and practical judicial origins، and the significance of judicial basics appears as a guide which the evidence of two most important proofs in Jurisprudence basics depends on it،i.e.،  the primary meaning of words and the prophetic and Imami traditions Hadith which is narrated by just one narrator of tradition