An analytical and descriptive study on administrative decision transformation has been conducted

Abstract

Saving the administration and diminishing the invalidity of administrative decisions is the topic of this study. The concept suggests that converting flawed administrative decisions into valid ones could achieve this goal. When an administrative decision includes the conditions of a legitimate decision but is, nonetheless, invalid or open to annulment, it is possible to transform it into a valid

decision. The new decision would fulfill the decision criteria if it is evident that the administration's intention was directed towards it upon learning of the original decision's annulment. To achieve the public interest, the administration is subject to legislative and judicial oversight. Nonetheless, certain legal measures allow for addressing additional decision cases and to avoid their annulment by the judiciary. The public interest is often the goal when it comes to maintaining administrative decisions. There are ways to transform a null or defective administrative decision into a valid one, which allows for a set of guarantees and a presumption of validity. This approach prevents the decision from being annulled. Through an imperfect attempt, the researcher sets out to address the uncertainty surrounding the transformed administrative decision. Questions arise regarding its source, circumstances, and the conversion of an invalid decision to a valid one. Despite limitations, this endeavor seeks to shed light on these areas of ambiguity, understanding that every undertaking has its imperfections when condensed