THE EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF PARAMETER ON SINGLE POINT INCREMENTAL FORMING OF TITANIUM

Authors

  • Doaa monther sadiq Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8233-4273
  • Iman J. Abed Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
  • Shakir Gatea Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/140404

Keywords:

SPIF, Step Size, Tool Diameter, Thickness Reduction

Abstract

Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) has emerged as a promising technique for shaping complex geometries in various materials. This study investigates the influence of process parameters, specifically step size and tool diameter, on the SPIF of titanium sheets. The experiment comprises three different step sizes (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mm) and three tool diameters (6, 10, and 14 mm), applied to titanium sheets. The research focuses on evaluating the impact of these parameters on three crucial aspects of SPIF: thickness reduction, fracture depth, and forming angle in the fracture zone. Through a series of experiments, the relationship between step size, tool diameter, and these performance indicators is thoroughly examined. Results indicate that smaller step sizes lead to higher thickness reductions and more precise forming angles in the fracture region and smaller tool diameters also increased fracture depths. Understanding the interplay between these parameters is vital for optimizing SPIF processes in titanium sheet forming applications, offering insights for enhanced production efficiency and quality in industries relying on advanced forming techniques. The CNC forming process took about 10 hours.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambrogio G, Filice L, Gagliardi F. Enhancing incremental sheet forming performance using high speed. Key Eng Mater 2011;473:847–52.

Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A, Memola Capece Minutolo F. The influence of tool rotation on an incremental forming process. J Mater Proc Technol 2009;209:4621–6.

Governale A, Lo Franco A, Panzeca A, Fratini L, Micari F. Incremental forming process for the accomplishment of automotive details. Key Eng Mater 2007;344:559–66.

Franzen V, Kwiatkowski L, Martins PAF, Tekkaya AE. Single point incremental forming of PVC. J Mater Proc Technol 2009;209:462–9.

Froes FH, Friedrich H, Kiese J, Bergoint D. Titanium in the family automobile: the cost challenge, JOM-the minerals. Met Mater Soc 2004:40–4.

Hamilton K, Jeswiet J. Single point incremental forming at high feed rates and rotational speeds: surface and structural consequences. CIRP Ann 2010;59(1):311–4.

Hefti LD. Elevated temperature fabrication of titanium aerospace components. Key Eng Mater 2010;433:49–55.

Ho-Sung Lee, Jong-Hoon Yoon, Yeong-Moo Yi. Manufacturing of titanium spherical and hollow cylinder vessel using blow forming. Key Eng Mater 2010;433:57–62.

Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J. Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. Ann CIRP 2005;54:623–50.

Jeswiet J, Geiger M, Engel U, Kleiner M, Schikorra M, Duflou J, et al. Metal forming progress since 2000, CIRP. J Manuf Sci Technol 2008;1:2–17.

Odenberger EL, Pederson R, Oldenburg M. Thermo-mechanical material response and hot sheet metal forming of Ti-6242. Mater Sci Eng A 2008;489:158–68.

Swale B, Pizzingrilli M, McCullagh E. Superplastic forming – cost effective. Key Eng Mater 2010; 433:41–7.

Tsuzuku T. Superplastic forming of aerospace metallic materials. Mater Sci Forum 1999;304–306:831–6.

Vanderhasten M, Rabet L, Verlinden B. Ti–6Al–4V, Deformation map and modelisation of tensile behaviour. Mater Des 2008;29:1090–8.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

sadiq, Doaa monther, et al. “THE EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF PARAMETER ON SINGLE POINT INCREMENTAL FORMING OF TITANIUM ”. Kufa Journal of Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, Oct. 2023, pp. 42-55, doi:10.30572/2018/KJE/140404.