STUDY OF THE WATER QUALITY INDEX (WQI) IN NAJAF GOVERNORATE, AL-KUFA AND AL-ABASSIYA RIVERS AS A CASE STUDY

Hayder M.  Jasem

doi:10.30572/2018/KJE/170133

Authors

Hayder M. Jasem Dept. of Structures and Water Resources, College of Eng., Univ. of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/170133

Keywords:

Water quality index (WQI), Canadian Council, Total hardness, Agricultural runoff

Abstract

Water Quality Index (WQI) is a practical and distinctive way to gauge the quality of water. It is frequently used to analyse water quality and determine its suitability for various uses by stating the status of the water in plain terms (good or terrible, usable or unusable, etc.). The purpose of the study is to evaluate the water quality index (WQI) in the Euphrates River (Al-kufa and Al-Abassia rivers). The site was monitored and evaluated, then data collection over a two-year from 2022 to 2023 on two station sampling sites, S1 and S2 within the river. Twelve physio-chemical parameters were examined in accordance with the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index methodology (CCME WQI) in order to determine the WQI. These parameters (pH, turbidity (TUR) dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved salts (TDS), sulfate ion (SO4-2), Chloride ion (Cl-), nitrate ion (NO3-), Phosphate ion (PO4-3), total hardness (TH), alkalinity (Alk), calcium (Ca2+), and magnesium (Mg+2). All data were within the World Health Organization's allowed limits, with the exception of SO4-2, TUR, and TDS, which all exceeded the WHO's allowable limits at the two stations (S1 and S2) over the study period, as well as chloride (Cl-) concentrations during specific months. At the S1 station, the highest values for the parameters (SO4-2, TDS, and TUR) were (466, 1100, 19.8) and (414, 1218, 20.15) in 2022 and 2023, respectively. At the S2 station, the highest values for the parameters (SO4-2, TDS, and TUR) were (427, 1043, 16.45) and (397, 1151.5, 22.55) in 2022 and 2023, respectively. during the study period the WQI displayed clear fluctuation, with good, fair, and marginal quality, The highest values were (79.12 and 65.81) at the S1 station in 2022 and 2023 and (86.1 and 79.33) at the S2 station in 2022 and 2023, respectively. According to the current study, human activity, agricultural runoff, and the discharge of improperly treated wastewater have all contributed to the pollution of the Euphrates River, rendering it unfit for human consumption unless properly treated

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abed, Z. H., and Khudair, K. M. (2023) "Investigation of high-turbidity tap water problem in Najaf governorate/middle of Iraq. Open Engineering, 13(1), 20220425.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0425

Abed, Z. H., and Khudair, M. K. (2023) "MODELING OF TURBIDITY DISTRIBUTION IN WATER NETWORKS USING PMS MODEL - AL-SARAY SECTOR IN KUFA CITY AS A CASE STUDY”, Kufa Journal of Engineering. ,14(3), 48-6. Available from: https://journal.uokufa.edu.iq/index.php/kje/article/view/12026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/140304

Abed, Z. H., Jasem, H. M., and Mohammed, H. S. (2024) "Predictive Modeling the Turbidity Response in Al-Saray Water Distribution Network in Najaf Governorate/Middle of Iraq, Using PODDS Model",Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20(2), 1095-1106.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2024-0079

Al-Khuzaie, M. M., Abdul Maulud, K. N., Wan Mohtar, W. H. M., and Yaseen, Z. M. (2025) "Modelling Euphrates River water quality index based on field measured data in Al-Diwaniyah City, Iraq", Scientific Reports, 15(1), 51.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84072-1

Al-Sulaiman, A. M., Shubbar, R. M., & Al-Obaidi, B. H. (2025)" Water Quality Evaluation of Diwaniyah River Using the Nemerow Pollution Index", Kufa Journal of Engineering,16(2),1-15, https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/160201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/160201

Jasem, H. M., and Khudair, K. M. (2023). "Effect of Biopipe Total Flowrate on Venturi Aerator Performance", Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, 23(1).‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.33971/bjes.23.1.1

Noori, M. M., Abdulrazzaq, K. A., and Mohammed, A. H. (2017) "Evaluation of water quality using Bhargava water quality index method and GIS, case study: Euphrates River in Al-Najaf City", International Journal of Science and Research, 6(7), 1286-1295.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20175545

Pieper, K. J., Tang, M., Jones, C. N., Weiss, S., Greene, A., Mohsin, H., and Edwards, M. A. (2018)"Impact of road salt on drinking water quality and infrastructure corrosion in private wells", Environmental science & technology, 52(24), 14078-14087.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04709

Sérodes, J. B., Behmel, S., Simard, S., Laflamme, O., Grondin, A., Beaulieu, C., and Rodriguez, M. J. (2021) "Tracking domestic wastewater and road de-icing salt in a municipal drinking water reservoir: acesulfame and chloride as co-tracers" Water Research, 203, 117493.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117493

Stark, J. R. (2000) "Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Iowa, and North Dakota", 1995-98 (No. 1211). US Geological Survey, Water Resources Division.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1211

Uddin, M. G., Nash, S., and Olbert, A. I. (2021) "A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality", Ecological Indicators, 122, 107218.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218

WATER, CCME. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. User’s Manual, 2001.‏

WHO chronicle. (2011) "Guidelines for drinking-water quality", 4th ed., 38(4), 104-8.‏

World Health Organization. (2022) " Guidelines for drinking-water quality”, incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda. World Health Organization.‏