Criticism of the scientific foundations of Sadiq Jalal's position on religious thought

Abstract

Religious thought is concentrated in a broad position among Arab and Islamic studies, and it enters into multiple and manifold fields of the joints of Arab and Islamic society in theory and behavior, and it has many literature, letters, statements, and attitudes towards all the events on its various topics, and many

scholars and thinkers have criticized and renewed it, including from them Muhammad Iqbal , Murtada  Al-Muthari, Muhammad Arkoun, and Sadiq Jalal Al-Azm, which is the subject of our research, and the question about which the research revolves is: Are the views of Sadiq Jalal Al-Azm in the topic of criticism of religious thought subject to critical study in terms of the foundations upon which his criticism is based and in terms of It has the same? As for the most important results of the research, it is: that Sadiq Jalal’s critical attitude towards the Qur’anic stories is a position that is limited to sense only, in addition to Sadiq Jalal’s passage of the fences of criticizing religious thought and his storming of the limits of religion, and that adopting Sadiq Jalal’s criticism for reconciling science and religion over fetal science It is an innovation based on confusion between Ijd with the natural law and the first, as well as a coup inference in his criticism for reconciling science and religion with reliance on wave theory, as it proved something in terms of its will to deny, as it proved the existence of the invisible in terms of its will to deny it.