Morphological Categories in Arabic: An Epistemological Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36318/jall/2026/v1.i42.22215Keywords:
Categories, morphemes, usage, morphologyAbstract
Objectives: The study aims to present a comprehensive cognitive model of Arabic morphological categories, based on their philosophy, their essence, and their various values.
Methodology: The study adopts induction, description, and hypothesis. Induction traces the category through its existential and philosophical history, leading up to its linguistic context. Description explains its linguistic tools, and hypothesis is based on its functional values.
Results: The study concludes that Arabic morphological categories have meanings that are realized in the divisive structure when specific morphemic affixes are added to them, whether prefixed, suffixed, or infixes. The Arabic morphological categories are: person, number, designation, gender, inflection, and predication. It states that Arabic morphological categories are the same as logical categories, since language is equivalent to thought. It also identifies the determinants of the morphological category. Furthermore, it has found that morphological categories possess competencies that ensure they perform horizontal centrality tasks to classify the divisional structures vertically within them.
Conclusion: Arabic morphological categories have their own tools, functional values, and investment potentials.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 الدكتور محمد أحمد هويمل الخريسات

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
which allows users to copy, create extracts, abstracts, and new works from the Article, alter and revise the Article, and make commercial use of the Article (including reuse and/or resale of the Article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work.







