Peer Review Process

1- The Journal of Kufa-Physics operates a single-anonymized (single-blind) peer-review process, in which reviewers remain anonymous to the authors.

2- The received manuscripts will be forwarded to a language editor  to perform plagiarism and similarity screening and evaluate the author/s writing quality.

3- In case, the similarity rate is higher than 20%, and/or the manuscript's writing level is unacceptable, then the manuscript with the plagiarism report and/or the language editor's comments will be sent to the the authors' writing quality.

4- The next step is sending the revised manuscript  to three reviewers with an evaluation form to evaluate its scientific importance, results, and validity for publishing.

5- The third step comprises sending the reviewers' comments back to the authors to modify them. Therefore, at least two of the three reviewers must recommend the manuscript for publication. Reviewer recommendations inform, but do not replace, the final editorial decision, which is made by the Editor-in-Chief or handling editor.

6- Editors are not involved in decisions about papers that they have written themselves or have been written by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an interest.

7- After the acceptance of the manuscript it will be sent to the copyeditor, to correct language, formatting, and production-related issues  of the manuscript, then prepare the manuscript in the journal's final publication format of the manuscript.