SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFITTING CODAL PROVISIONS –STATE OF THE ART
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/130103Keywords:
Capacity Spectrum Method, Seismic Evaluation, Displacement Coefficient Method, Capacity Curve, Pushover AnalysisAbstract
Seismic evaluation is one of the important ways to validate that buildings can resist the earthquake loads. The seismic evaluation is classified into global and local checking; the global includes the overall lateral deflection and inter-story drift, the local involves the plastic hinge formed in the structural elements (beams, columns, shear wall, etc.) of the buildings. This paper includes the seismic evaluation techniques according to previous international codes. These codes include ATC-40, FEMA-273, FEMA-356, FEMA-440, ASCE41-13, Euro code 8, Japanese standard code, and Newzland code. This study showed that the seismic evaluation techniques introduced in FEMA-440 and the Japanese standard code are almost complete compared with the other techniques in the other codes.
Downloads
References
Giordano, M., Guadagnuolo and Faella G. (2008) “Pushover Analysis of Plan Irregular Masonry Buildings” The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
Hamraj. M. (2014) “Performance Based Pushover Analysis of R.C.C Frames for Plan Irregularity”, International Journal of science, Engineering and Techonology, Vol.7.
Mwafy A.M. and Elnashai.A.S. (2001) “Push Versus Dynamic Collapse Analysis of R/C Buildings”, International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science, Vol.4.
Elnashai A. S. and Di Sarno L., (2008), “Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering”. Wiley and Sons, UK.
Yön, B., Sayın, E. and Onat, O. (2017), “Earthquakes and Structural Damages”, Earthquakes - Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation, DOI: 10.5772/65425.
Applied Technology Council, (1996), “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”, Report No. SSC 9601: ATC-40, Vol.1, Redwood City, California.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, (1997) “NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, FEMA-273”, Washington, D.C.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, (2000) “Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
ATC, Applied Technology Council. (2005) “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures”, FEMA440 Report. Redwood City, CA.
ASCE, “Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary” (2013). ASCE standard no.004-98, American Society of Civil Engineering.
CEN (2005a), EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8; “Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings” (1998), European Committee for standardization.
Fajfar, P.; Fischinger, M.(1988), “N2—A Method for Nonlinear seismic analysis of regular buildings”, In Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA), (2001), “Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings” (JBDPA, Tokyo).
NZS1170.5. (2004), “Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand”, Standards New Zealand, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Haider A. Abass, Husain K. Jarallah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
