The legal ruling for stem cell therapy in Iraqi and Jordanian law ( A comparative study )

Abstract

Abstract: In the modern era, a qualitative leap has appeared in stem cell therapy, and this type of treatment represents a major problem that falls within the scope of responsibility. These rules determine the civil responsibility of the doctor arising from his violation of the use of stem cell therapy, and it became clear from the research that the idea of benefiting from stem cells depends in the treatment of diseases on their functional role in building all types of cells and tissues, such as: heart, brain, bone, and other cells, when The availability of stem cells, they work to compensate for diseased or damaged cells, whose functions have ceased, by transplanting them in the affected or damaged place of the body, after extracting them from their source, and the Iraqi legislator did not expressly stipulate the provisions of stem cell therapy and the doctor’s responsibility for them, except Article (202) of the Iraqi Civil Code stipulates the provisions of the obligation to compensate in case of harm or harm to the