Comparison of a Classifier Performance Testing Methods: Support Vector Machine Classifier on Mammogram Images Classification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31642/JoKMC/2018/060102Keywords:
multiclass SVM, classifier test , cross-validation , hold-outAbstract
This paper compares between testing performance methods of classifier algorithm on a standard database of mammogram images. Mammographic interchange society dataset (MIAS) is used in this work. For classifying these images tumors a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used. Evaluating this classifier accuracy for classifying the mammogram tumors into the malignant, benign or normal case is done using two evaluating classifier methods that are a hold-out method and one of the cross-validation methods. Then selecting the better test method depending on the obtained classifier accuracy and the running time consumed with each method. The classifier accuracy, training time and the classification time are considered for comparison purposeDownloads
References
Eltoukhy, Mohamed Meselhy, Ibrahima Faye, and Brahim Belhaouari Samir. "A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation." Computers in biology and medicine 42, no. 1 (2012): 123-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.10.016
Awad, Mariette, and Rahul Khanna. Efficient learning machines: theories, concepts, and applications for engineers and system designers. Apress, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9
Dougherty, Geoff. Pattern recognition and classification: an introduction. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5323-9_1
Ahuja, Yashima, and Sumit Kumar Yadav. "Multiclass classification and support vector machine." Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Interdisciplinary 12, no. 11 (2012): 14-20.
Alexandre Kowalczyk. Support vector machines succinctly released. Syncfusion, 2017.
Felkin, Mary. "Comparing classification results between n-ary and binary problems." In Quality Measures in Data Mining, pp. 277-301. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44918-8_12
Dobbin, Kevin K., and Richard M. Simon. "Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers." BMC medical genomics 4, no. 1 (2011): 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-31
Baumann, Désirée, and Knut Baumann. "Reliable estimation of prediction errors for QSAR models under model uncertainty using double cross-validation." Journal of cheminformatics 6, no. 1 (2014): 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-014-0047-1
Mustafa nafea, “tissue classification based on intelligence computing model”, Mustansiriyah university, 2017.
Faozia A. S. alsarori “automatic detection of breast cancer in mammogram images”, 2013
Y. LI ET AL. “texture analysis for mass classification in mammograms”, pattern recognition letters 52,2014, 87-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2014.10.008
N. AL-NAJDAWI ET Al, “mammogram image enhancement, mass segmentation and classification”, applied soft computing 35, 2015, 175-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.029
H. Mohamed, M.S. mabrouk, A. sharawy, “Computer aided detection system for micro-calcifications in digital mammograms”, computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.04.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Thekra Hayder Abbas, Sura Jasim Mohammed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
which allows users to copy, create extracts, abstracts, and new works from the Article, alter and revise the Article, and make commercial use of the Article (including reuse and/or resale of the Article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work.