GRIMA’S MALICIOUSNESS AND FALSE SOLIDARITY IN TOLKIEN’S NOVEL THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING: DURKHEIM PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Mohsen Hanif Assistant Professor. Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
  • Abbas Razzaq Hameed al-Thabhawee PhD Candidate, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i49.1682

Keywords:

negative solidarity, Grima, Theoden, Saruman

Abstract

This study will scrutinize the excessive ambition and negative solidarity of Grima as a servant of two masters who are the king Theoden and the White Wizard Saruman in Tolkien’s novel The Lord of the Rings. To this end, the novel is analyzed with respect to the concept of negative solidarity according to Durkheim's perspective. According to Durkheim, a few types of solidarity that are negative in which social relations and connections are at the basic rank essential for coexistence. In fact, negative solidarity is a problematic order because it is untrue solidarity and cannot make any kind of integration by itself but rather assumes it. Besides, the solidarity of Grima with the king, Theoden, and Saruman was not real but built on mutual benefit. Saruman was in need of Gríma as an instrument to involve in destroying the king, Theoden, in order to take control over Rohan and Grima was in need of Saruman to marry the woman he wanted and probably even Theoden's kingdom

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-10-19

How to Cite

Hanif, Mohsen, and Abbas al-Thabhawee. “ GRIMA’S MALICIOUSNESS AND FALSE SOLIDARITY IN TOLKIEN’S NOVEL THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING: DURKHEIM PERSPECTIVE”. Kufa Journal of Arts, vol. 1, no. 49, Oct. 2021, pp. 619-28, doi:10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i49.1682.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.