Citing Testimony in Proceedings (its Terms, Validity, and Impact on Sentence of the Court)

Authors

  • Mysam Taram asistant professor--college of theology, Shahid bahonar university of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
  • Ghaleb Gadiri Assistant professor, vali-e-Asr university of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
  • hamid Reza parhammehr faculty member of the lawDepartment, university of zabol, zabol,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i49.1683

Keywords:

Testimony, Witness, Reasons for Proof

Abstract

Allegation of testimony has always been one of the reasons in the legal system for proving litigation. However, in countries where there is no need to make the witness to provide allegation of testimony on the one hand and considering the fact that the original principle is the innocence of the denier, testimony has largely lost its performance as a proof. Under the circumstances considered, allegation of testimony is accepted by the Muslims and its persuation as a great sin. Contrary to Islamic jurisprudence, the Iranian law does not accept the allegation of testimony; however, Western and Arab laws in accordance with Islamic jurisprudence consider testimony refusal as a crime and consider punishments for it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-10-19

How to Cite

Taram, Mysam, et al. “Citing Testimony in Proceedings (its Terms, Validity, and Impact on Sentence of the Court)”. Kufa Journal of Arts, vol. 1, no. 49, Oct. 2021, pp. 629-36, doi:10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i49.1683.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.