Measuring the impact of intellectual capital in accounting on developing the capabilities of university students, field research at Bukan University

Authors

  • Rizkar Ali Ahmed University of Sulaimani, College of Administration and Economics
  • Afsar Ali Muradi University of Sulaimani, College of Administration and Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36325/ghjec.v15i4.17231

Keywords:

Intellectual Capital, Knowledge, Education, Capital Measurement.

Abstract

Intellectual capital aspects such as human capital, structural capital and customer capital are important variables of the whole intellectual capital management programmed, which forms part of the knowledge management initiatives of institutes of higher learning. The skills and expertise of university staff as part of its human capital are discussed. Structural capital will encompass aspects such as the role of innovation and intellectual property rights. Customer capital of the university and the knowledge of stakeholders in the field of tertiary education are becoming more important. The results of a study done at aUniversityofHuman Developmentare used to indicate which of these aspects needs to be measured and a new framework for measurement Intellectual capital.

Skills, creativity, values and culture are among affecting factors which are a great consensus on the importance of intangible assets as a source of economic competition for educational institutions. However, it was not possible to develop reliable measures to measure these assets, but the intellectual capital of the institution and its management becomes a competitive advantage for enterprises that requires new talent to measure these intangible assets

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

How to Cite

Ahmed, R.A. and Muradi, A.A. (2018) “Measuring the impact of intellectual capital in accounting on developing the capabilities of university students, field research at Bukan University”, Al-Ghary Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 15(4), pp. 586–611. doi:10.36325/ghjec.v15i4.17231.

Share