Peer Review Process
- The review process of Al-Ghary Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences aims to help authors meet the journal's scope and the discipline's scientific standards. This is so critical for establishing reliable publications to enrich humanity sciences.
- The Journal system uses a double-blind process for reviewing. Each article will be reviewed by the editorial board and 2 external experts. In addition to plagiarism and linguistic testing.
The received manuscripts will be forwarded to one linguistical editor to check out the plagiarism and evaluate the author/s writing quality. In case, the similarity rate is high, and/or the manuscript's writing level is unacceptable, then the manuscript with the plagiarism report and/or the linguistical editor comments will be sent to the author/s to fix it. The next step is sending the modified manuscript to two reviewers with an evaluation form. If one of the selected reviewers reject the manuscript, the managing editor will have to send it to a third reviewer to evaluate its scientific importance, results, and validity for publishing.
The third step comprises resending the reviewer comments to the author to fix them. Therefore, two reviewers out of three at least must agree the manuscript's soundness for publishing to be accepted.