Assessment of security strategic readinessAn analytical study in the National Security Directorate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36322/jksc.176(B).19612Keywords:
strategic readiness, security strategic readinessAbstract
Purpose: The research seeks to know the interest of the surveyed directorate in the security strategic readiness in its dimensions (culture, leadership, teamwork, knowledge exchange).
Methodology: For the purpose of achieving the objectives of the research, the analytical descriptive approach was used based on the questionnaire form as a tool for collecting the necessary data, and the research relied on analyzing its data on the statistical program (SMART PLS). A questionnaire form was designed to diagnose the level of security strategic readiness and included (12) items distributed on dimensions of the variable.
Results: The research found a weakness in the general level in some aspects of security strategic readiness
The value of the research: The value of the research was that it shed light on the security strategic readiness and revealed some of its strengths and weaknesses, which requires those responsible for this strategy to take appropriate measures to enhance these aspects.
Downloads
References
المصادر العربية :
1. عمارة،حامد،1959المنهج العلمي في دراسة المجتمع، القاهرة، معهد الدراسات العربية.
2. دليو، فضيل، الاستراتيجية الامنية انواعها، تقنياتها ومتطلباتها ، 2017، الباحث الاجتماعي ،العدد13.
3. الدليمي، عبد الرزاق ،2019 ،العلاقات العامة وإدارة الأزمات"، عمان: دار اليازوري العلمية للنشر والتوزيع
4. الخطيب ،محمد، (2020). "القيادة الاستراتيجية ودورها في تطبيق إدارة المواهب كمدخل لتحقيق التميزالمؤسسي في الجامعات الفلسطينية"، رسالة دكتوراه، كلية العلوم الاقتصادية التجارية وعلوم التسيير، جامعة أمحمد بوقرة بومرداس، الجزائر.
5. الفقي ،ابراهيم،2009،العمل الجماعي دار اجيال للنشر والتوزيع.
6. ابوالنصر،مدحت محمد،2020، قادة المستقبل القيادة المتميزة الجديدة.
7. التكروري ،عبير الحاج صالح (2018) الإبداع-في-العمل-الجماعي-وتأثيره-على-الميزة-التنافسية-من-وجهة-نظر-العاملين-في القطاع-الصناعي-في-محافظةالخليل رسالة ماجستير مقدمة الى جامعة الخليل/فلسطين.
المصادر الاجنبية
1. 1. R. Kaplan and D. Norton (2004). Assessing Intangible Asset Strategic Readiness. 1-14 in Harvard Business Review
2. J. Adair, 2. (2007). How to Structure Team Creativity and Harvest Ideas: Leadership for Innovation. London and Philadelphia - Kogan Page
3. Ciborra, C.U., and Patriota, G. (1998). In R&D, groupware and teamwork have limits to learning and creativity. 1-10 in R&D Management, 28(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00080
4. 4. Argote, L., and P. Ingram (2000). Knowledge Transfer: A Foundation for Corporate Competitive Advantage. 82(1), 150-169. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
5. I. Nonaka, 5th (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Knowledge Production in Or-ganizations. Organization Science, 5, 1, pp. 14-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
6. I. Nonaka 6. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Disa-greement and Progress in Organizational Knowledge Production Theory. 635-665 in Organization Science, 20 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
7. Bukowitz, W.R., and R. L. Williams (1999).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 أ.م.د. ليث شاكر ابوطبيخ، الباحثة سجى عباس محسن
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permit others to distribute and copy the manuscript, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations, or derivative works of or from the manuscript (such as a translation), to include in a collective work, to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author''''s honor or reputation. Further details are found at Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
How to Cite
