Arbitrary Grammatical Opinions (Nouns as an example)

Abstract

One of the most important reasons for the flourishing of sciences is the competition between scholars, including grammar scholars, as the competition between them took on a character that was characterized by objectivity at times, and at others not. The two well-known grammarians - Basra and Kufa, or between the grammar scholars as individuals, but perhaps it was between two grammarians from one grammatical direction. This multiplicity of linguistic and grammatical opinions resulted, or let us say: the difference in their opinions is a crowd, rather a crowd of rulings and Terms or grammatical laws adopted by a group of them, in response, denial or violation, or as a directive to what others go to, and among these terms is the term (arbitrariness). Proceeding from this or other things for which there is no room, we begin to study an important aspect of Arabic, which is (the arbitrariness) in the opinions of its linguists and their directives in the (grammatical structure) in order to stand on a theoretical-procedural part, through which the nature of the phenomenon and its evidence are revealed according to the descriptive, analytical and normative approach. . This modest research is divided into paragraphs:

The first: sighing.

The second: (since and since) and the noun that follows them.

The third: the accusative factor excluded by (except).

As we studied the multiplicity of opinions and grammatical attitudes described as (arbitrariness), wherever they were found, and with the observation of comparison, balancing, weighting of the right, and criticism of the wrong. Then we followed the research with a conclusion in which we summarized the most important results, and then we included the margins and sources of the research.