Aviation Economy and the Balance of Payments in Iraq: A Hybrid Analysis Using SWOT–TOPSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36325/ghjec.v22i2.22183Keywords:
Aviation economy, balance of payments, SWOT analysis, TOPSIS, digital transformation.Abstract
The civil aviation sector is a pillar of economic growth strategy due to its effective role in facilitating commercial operations and expanding tourism services, in addition to providing job opportunities. In rentier economies such as Iraq, where oil is the main source of income, it is important to stimulate non-oil sectors, particularly aviation services, in order to strengthen the balance of payments' capacity to achieve comprehensive economic diversification. The objective of this study is to analyse the structural and financial framework of the civil aviation sector in Iraq during the period (2015-2024) and assess its ability to sustainably support the balance of payments.
This study uses a mixed analytical framework combining the SWOT and TOPSIS methods, in addition to multi-criteria decision-making tools based on the Python language (PY Decision). Quantitative indicators based on passenger traffic, air cargo volume and aviation revenues were extracted using official data from the Central Bank of Iraq, the Ministry of Transport and international aviation organisations, The research findings regarding the balance of payments are as follows:
The research findings show that the aviation sector is strategically important as a catalyst for improving Iraq's external balance, particularly the services account in the balance of payments. Unlike rentier exports, aviation services—such as passenger transport, cargo logistics, and flight operations—generate foreign cash flows that are less dependent on commodity price cycles and more resilient to global demand fluctuations.
Simulation analysis shows that digital transformation (alternative B) emerges as the most effective measure, capable of increasing aviation revenues by 25% and reducing the services account deficit by up to 40% by 2030.
These gains can be achieved by improving transaction transparency, enhancing ticketing and shipping processes, and reducing foreign currency leakage through domestic services. In addition, regulatory reforms (Alternative D) complement this scenario by addressing structural deficiencies and improving regulatory responsiveness.
Downloads
References
1. Altynbek, N., Sarsenov, A., & Mukanov, R. (2021). Digital transformation and aviation competitiveness in Kazakhstan. Journal of Air Transport Management, 95, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102135
2. Belobaba, P., Odoni, A., & Barnhart, C. (2015). The Global Airline Industry (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
3. Board of Supreme Audit – Iraq. (2022). Audit Report on Civil Aviation Projects. Baghdad.
4. Central Bank of Iraq. (2015–2024). Balance of Payments Reports. Baghdad: Central Bank of Iraq.
5. COSIT – Central Organization for Statistics. (2015–2023). Air Transport Statistics. Baghdad: Ministry of Planning.
6. Dožić, S. (2019). Application of MCDM methods in airline performance evaluation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 81, 101713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101713
7. Heller, A. (2022). An applied framework for quantifying aviation emissions using the ICAO calculator. F1000Research, 11, 1278. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122763.1
8. Huang, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Entropy-based weight assignment in MCDM under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 215, 119196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119196
9. IATA. (2024). Annual Review. International Air Transport Association.
10. ICAO. (2023). Economic Development of Air Transport. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int
11. International and Scientific Sources
12. Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority. (2023). Annual Report on Civil Aviation Performance. Baghdad: Ministry of Transport.
13. Kiracı, K., et al. (2020). Aircraft selection using AHP–TOPSIS under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106553.
14. Ndlela, D., & Moyo, S. (2023). Air transport reforms and balance of payments sustainability in South Africa. Transport Policy, 128, 27–39.
15. Vittek, M., et al. (2021). Air transport and socio-economic development: Evidence from emerging economies. Transport Policy, 104, 78–92.
16. World Bank. (2023). Iraq Economic Monitor: Navigating Fiscal Pressures. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17. Yuliawati, E. (2025). Investigating pilot precondition as a latent risk factor in aviation operations. F1000Research, 14(128), 405. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140405.1
18. Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making methods in economics: An overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
19. Zhang, A. (2020). Aviation and economic performance: A global evidence review. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101919.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ريم شاكر كتاب
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
which allows users to copy and create excerpts and summaries, and thus create new scientific works from the article or modify it and benefit from the scientific material, provided that the user refers to the link to the original article
