Contextual leadership intelligence and Strategic ambidexterity and their role in reducing organizational inertia: Analytical research in the Ministry of Water Resources

Authors

  • Mustafa AbdulAbbas Assad University of Baghdad, College of Islamic Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36325/ghjec.v20i4.17511

Keywords:

Contextual leadership intelligence, Strategic ambidexterity, Organizational inertia, Ministry of Water Resources

Abstract

The current research aims to test the effect of contextual leadership intelligence, whose dimensions included (tacit knowledge, 3D- Thinking, Synchronicity) and strategic ambidexterity, whose dimensions included (Exploration opportunities, Exploiting opportunities) in reducing organizational inertia, whose dimensions included (insight inertia, work inertia, psychological inertia), and the research adopted the questionnaire as a tool for collecting data, and the data was analyzed using the statistical package (SPSS, Amos V.23) and relied on a set of statistical methods considered in the analysis, the most important of which are (normal distribution test, confirmatory factor analysis, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation , correlation, simple regression, multiple regression), The research reached a set of results, the most important of which is that the researched organization suffers from organizational inertia in (insight inertia, work inertia, psychological inertia), and that contextual leadership intelligence and strategic ambidexterity have a relationship and an inverse effect on organizational inertia,as more the researched organization adopts contextual leadership intelligence and strategic ambidexterity, this leads to reducing the state of organizational inertia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Assad, M.A. (2025) “Contextual leadership intelligence and Strategic ambidexterity and their role in reducing organizational inertia: Analytical research in the Ministry of Water Resources”, Al-Ghary Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 21(1), pp. 127–166. doi:10.36325/ghjec.v20i4.17511.

Share