Testing the autocorrelation problem in multiple linear regression modelUsing solid technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36322/jksc.177(B).20379Keywords:
least squares method, autocorrelation, high leverage points, Broch-Godfrey hippocampal test, outliers, GM-estimatorAbstract
Linear regression is one of the important and commonly used methods in analyzing, estimating, and predicting the future values of the phenomena studied in many economic, medical, psychological, and other branches. The Ordinary Least Square method is one of the commonly used methods for estimating the linear regression equation. To apply the least squares (OLS) method, a set of assumptions must be verified. However, violating one of these assumptions leads to a group of problems, the most important of which are the problem of violating the normal distribution, the problem of multicollinearity, the problem of heterogeneity of variance, and the problem of autocorrelation between random errors. In this study, the focus was on the autocorrelation problem due to its responsibility for violating important properties of ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates. The Brosch-Godfrey test is the most widely used method to detect autocorrelation. However, recent studies have shown that this test is easily affected by high leverage points. In this paper, we proposed a new method for testing the hippocampal Broch-Godfrey that is resistant to high leverage points. The performance of the proposed method was compared with existing methods using a set of real data as well as a simulation study. The results of the study showed that the proposed Brosch-Godfrey test is very powerful in detecting the problem of autocorrelation with and without the presence of high leverage points.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES:
1- C.E. Alciaturi, M.E. Escobar and I. Estéves, “The use of the autocorrelation function in modeling of multivariate data,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 134-140, Nov. 2005.
2- T.S. Breusch, “Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear model,” Australian Economic Papers, vol. 17, no. 31, pp. 334-355, Dec. 1978.
3- J. Durbin and G.S. Watson, “Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression II,” Biometrika, vol.38, no.1-2, pp. 159-178, Jun. 1951.
4- H.L. Harter, “The Method of least squares and some alternatives-part II,” International Sta-tistics Review, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 235-264, Dec. 1974.
5- L.G. Godfrey, “Testing for higher order serial correlation in regression equations when the regressors include lagged dependent variables,” Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1303-1310, Nov. 1978.
6- M. Habshah, M.R. Norazan and A.H.M.R. Imon, “The performance of diagnostic-robust generalized potentials for the identification of multiple high leverage points in linear regres-sion,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 36, no.5, pp. 62-99, May 2009.
7- H. Midi and A. Bahrein, Robust Multicollinearity Diagnostic Measure in Collinear Data Set. WSEAS Press, 2010, pp. 138-142.
8- H. Midi, S. Rana and A.H.M.R. Imon, “The Performance of Robust Weighted Least Squares in the Presence of Outliers and Heteroscedastic Errors,” WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS, vol. 7, no. 8, pp.351-361, July 2009.
9- M.R. Norazan, H. Midi and A.H.M.R. Imon, “Estimating Regression Coefficients using Weighted Bootstrap with Probability,” WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS, vol. 7 no.8, pp.362-371, July 2009.
10- M.S. Rana, H. Midi and A.H.M.R. Imon, “A robust modification of the Goldfeld-Quandt test for the detection of heteroscedasticity in the presence of outliers,” Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 277-283, 2008.
11- H. Riazoshams, H. Midi and O. Sharipov, “The performance of robust two-stage estima-tor in nonlinear regression with autocorrelated error,” Communications in Statistics. Simula-tion and Computation, vol. 39, no.6, pp. 1236-1253, Jun. 2010.
12- R.E. Shiffler and A.J. Adams, Introductory Business Statistics with Computer Applica-tions. Belmont, Calif: Duxbury Press, 1995.
13- V. Yohai, “High Breakdown-point and High Efficiency Estimates for Regression,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 15, no.2, pp. 642-665, Jun 1978.
14- P. McClave and T. James, Statistics for Business and Economics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall,2007, ch 11
15- A. Fitrianto and H. Midi, A Screening Algorithm in Simulation of Mediation Models, WSEAS Press, 2010, pp. 154-158.
16- A. Fitrianto and H. Midi, “Estimating bias and RMSE of indirect effects using rescaled residual bootstrap in mediation analysis,” WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS, vol. 6, no. 9, pp.397-
406, Jun. 2010.
17- R.C. Geary, “Relative Efficiency of Count Sign Changes of Assessing Residual Auto-regression in Least Squares Regression,” Biometrika, vol. 57, no. 1,, pp. 123-127, Apr. 1970.
18- J.R.M. Hosking, “The multivariate portmanteau statistics,” Journal of American Statistical Association, vol. 75, no. 371, pp. 602-608, Sep. 1980.
19- H. Midi, “Preliminary estimators for robust non-linear regression estimation,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 26, no.5, pp. 591-600, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 أ.م.د. محمد عبد الحسين، الباحثة زهراء حيدر حسين

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permit others to distribute and copy the manuscript, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations, or derivative works of or from the manuscript (such as a translation), to include in a collective work, to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author''''s honor or reputation. Further details are found at Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)


























