Integrative thinking with university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36322/jksc.179(A).22698Keywords:
Integrative thinking, gender and specialization variables, university studentsAbstract
The research problem is clarified by the main question: What is the level of integrative thinking among university students? Does integrative thinking differ according to the variables of gender and academic specialization among university students? The research aimed to identify integrative thinking among university students, and the statistical differences in integrative thinking according to the variables (gender and specialization). The current research is determined by students at the University of Kufa of both genders (males and females) and specializations (scientific and humanities) and for the academic year (2023-2024). (1445-1446), and the researcher used the descriptive, correlational approach, and the research community consisted of university students of both genders (male-female) and specialization (scientific-humanitarian) and for the academic year (2023-2024), The original research population was (25,847) male and female students, and the basic research sample was chosen by a stratified random method with (500) males and females, from both scientific and humanities specializations. To achieve the research objectives, the researcher built an integrative thinking scale based on Martin’s theory (Martin, R. (2007). After the statistical analysis indicators (validity and reliability) were verified, the integrative thinking scale consisted of (38) items, and each item had five graded alternatives.
Downloads
References
المراجع:
أولا: المراجع العربية:
1. الزند ، وليد خضير ، وعبيدات ، هاني حتمل (2011): المناهج التعليمية تصميمها تنفيذها ، تقويمها ، تطويرها ، ط1 ، عالم الكتب الحديث، اربد، الأردن.
2. الطيب، عصام علي (2006): اساليب التفكير / نظريات ودراسات معاصرة، القاهرة عالم الكتب، ط1.
3. العمري، خالد محمد صالح (2013): كشف الذات وعلاقته بالوحدة والاعراض الاكتئاب لدى عينة من طلبة جامعة اليرموك، أطروحة دكتوراه غير منشورة، عمان، الأردن.
4. داود عزيز حنا و عبد الرحمن، أنور حسين ( 1990 ): مناهج البحث التربوي، جامعة بغداد، العراق.
ثانيا: المراجع الأجنبية:
5. Katagiri, S. (2004): Mathematical thinking and how to teach it, criced , v, 342-343 .
6. Martin, R. (2007) : The opposable mind: how successful leaders win through integrative Boston, haruard Business school press . P. 6-78.
7. Oppenheim, B. (1982). An exercise in attitude measurement. In Social psychology (pp. 38-56). Palgrave, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16794-4_3
8. Roman, H. (2012) : STEM- its Importance and Promise for Gifted Students, Journal of the Illinois Association for Gifted Children, March, 3 .
9. Cooley, C. H. (1992). Looking-glass self. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction, 6, 126- 128.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 أ.د. فاضل محسن الميالي، الباحثة منى بهاء الدين عبد القادر
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permit others to distribute and copy the manuscript, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations, or derivative works of or from the manuscript (such as a translation), to include in a collective work, to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author''''s honor or reputation. Further details are found at Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
How to Cite
