The Rules of Apparent Rulings - An Applied Fundamental Study in the Rule of no Embarrassment

Abstract

Abstract

The rules of apparent rulings are a landmark and a rich source on which knowledge of legal rulings depends.  Being the justice of other rules that the jurist needs in deduction, studying them is of great importance and it is indispensable for the researcher to engage in these related investigations, and perhaps the most prominent of them is the college (Al-Kabarawiya) that characterizes it, which makes it the “middle limit” way in the process of extracting and deducing the legal ruling from  His well-known knowledge.

 And because the talk about these rules is related to a number of their assertions, the research decided to address the most important and most prominent of these rules, which is the rule of “there is nothing wrong” by studying it in two directions:

 The first is to research Al-Qaeda fundamentally by shedding light on its perceptions, and its governance - fundamentalism - on the primary evidence, and so on.

 And if the important thing for the jurist as well as the researcher is to talk about its jurisprudential applications, the research included a reference to a large number of these applications, in the various jurisprudential chapters, whether they were worship or transactions.  This was the second direction that the research adhered to.

 Therefore, this study included - in the light of the foregoing - two sections, which were distributed as follows:

 The first dealt with talking about the rules of apparent rulings in terms of importance, divisions, and the like.

 The second topic included the demands of the "There is no shame" rule at multiple levels, covering most if not all that can be studied and known about the rule.

 It did not fail me to mention the results, and perhaps the most important of them is that the fall of the primary rulings according to the rule of law, there is no shame, determination, no license , contrary to the well-known .