The significance of command and prohibition in Fara'id al-Usul

Authors

  • ستار البو صبيع ديوان جامعة الكوفة Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36324/fqhj.v2i55.21725

Keywords:

: Fara'id al-Usul, , Command, , Prohibition, , Implications of Command

Abstract

The study explores the key issues raised by Shaykh al-Ansari in this chapter, including the notion that a command does not always imply obligation unless accompanied by contextual evidence. Shaykh al-Ansari favored the view that a command appears to indicate obligation according to customary usage, rather than being its linguistic essence. He examined various scholarly opinions on the matter, ultimately supporting the view that a command signifies obligation in appearance, but not in literal linguistic truth. Shaykh al-Ansari is renowned for his precise Usuli methodology, as he does not merely transmit opinions but engages with them through rational critique and linguistic investigation. He balances between customary, rational, and legal indications, and highlights the impact of Usuli disagreements on jurisprudential branches. Accordingly, understanding the significance of command and prohibition as articulated by Shaykh al-Ansari plays a vital role in strengthening Usuli aptitude and establishing a solid scientific framework for deriving legal rulings. If you'd like help refining this into academic English or formatting it for a thesis abstract, I’d be happy to assist! Sure! Here's the translation of your keywords into English

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

14-07-2026

How to Cite

البو صبيع س. (2026). The significance of command and prohibition in Fara’id al-Usul. Journal of Jurisprudence Faculty, 2(55). https://doi.org/10.36324/fqhj.v2i55.21725

Share