The physician’s responsibility towards terminally ill patients from a jurisprudential-legal point of view

Abstract

The present article is written in a methodological, descriptive and analytical type and deals with patients and ultimately physicians in relation to these patients and their type of responsibility and attempts to answer this fundamental question: Which fundamentals of responsibility is the responsibility of the established physician versus the terminally ill? It is assumed that the type of responsibility of the physician must be expressed in detail with respect to the subject being discussed and so long as the treatment of the patient is possible, the responsibility of the physician must be assumed as a kind of error theory, but when current treatments are not effective and the patient has no choice but to wait for death, the responsibility of the physician must be considered As a kind of wrong assumption. And therefore , The physician's responsibility should be viewed as a kind of assuming fault. Thus, while also introducing a wide range of medical interventions, medical malpractice, and malfunctions to an end-of-life patient; So it is necessary to deal with related responsibilities as well.