Theories of interpreting the verbal significance of the fundamentalists, a linguistic approach

Abstract

The research dealt with the theories of interpretation of verbal significance in the fundamentalist lesson, which attempted to explain the nature of the linguistic relationship between the word and meaning, and to discover its truth, and to explain how it led to finding a causal type between the word and its meaning. The study presented a significant indication of its linguistic and theological dimension and its divisions and focused on the linguistic significance - specifically - and presented its analysis taken by the fundamentalists originally Muslim, arranged on it some fundamentalist issues, and the branches of reasoning, and highlighted the depth of this analysis and exceeded it for some of the results of structural studies in relation to the linguistic sign. As this type of research is linked to the analytical research of the fundamentalists and philosophers of the modern language, it necessitated a comprehensive statement of the nature of the fundamentalist research, its diversity, the types of verbal inquiry that the jurisprudence has to offer, , As well as the identification of the research space to which (the situation), which drew multiple theories to reveal the truth and statement Kahnh. The research record of the fundamentalists is the first to answer the question about the relationship between the word and the meaning of the level of mental breakdown and correlation between them, which they see represents the reality of the situation and the presentation of their most important theories in comparison with the latest outputs of the modern linguistic research