The authenticity of Abu Hurairah's narrations from the point of view of Sharaf al-Din al-Amili and Mahmoud Aburiyeh

Abstract

Tradition after the Holy Qur’an is considered one of the most reliable documents for presenting Islamic rites, and Abu Hurairah is one of the most personalities that have been borrowed from the hadiths of the Messenger of God (PBUH) at the beginning of Islam. He left him from five thousand and seven hundred hadiths that were severely criticized and opposed from different angles since the early days. Because of the lack of awareness and the superficiality of people, the hadiths of Abu Hurairah quickly spread among the people and permeated the books of interpretation, religion and history. These false hadiths led to negative effects on some beliefs and political, social and cultural issues. In this article, we intend to use an analytical method to compare the credibility of Abu Hurairah from the point of view of Sharaf al-Din Amili and Mahmoud Aburiyeh, and from the criteria of these two personalities, non-opposition to the Qur’an, specific traditions, reason, and non-opposition to what science approves, and we will consider these cases for quantitative and qualitative evaluation For the hadiths of Abu Hurairah to clarify the truth of this narrator. This research was conducted using the descriptive analytical method and desk study tools.